Back in the early 80's, when I was in high school, things were kinda tough for my family. Dad was just getting back to work after over a year of unemployment, and it was rough making ends meet. Needless to say, going to see a Broadway show was very far down this list of what to do with money. Of course, that did not deter my desire to go.
Well, finally, for Christmas, I got to see the show everyone else had raved about. I had memorized BOTH record albums of the Original Broadway Cast Recording. I had clipped out every news article I could find, and I even had the Newsweek issue that had the cast on the cover. I was fully prepared to be initiated and consumed like all of my friends were. We got to the theatre, and took our seats - front row center mezzanine! And I looked down at the set that I had seen so many times in pictures. It was a lot smaller than I thought it would be. And right in front of me was a can of some brand of tomato paste, huge, but so dirty that someone who had been there before me wrote in the dust, "clean me, please!" Hmmm...
If nothing else, Cats taught me one of the most valuable lessons I've learned from theatre-going: the more you expect, the greater chance you will be disappointed. And that has been true, over and over and over. I have written on here many times about going into a show trying hard not to know too much about it. And a great percentage of the time, I have found that the less I know, the better I like a show. Because I am seeing it as fresh for me as possible, it becomes MY experience. And isn't that the great thing about live theatre? It is happening now and just for me?
Back in the Cats days, you knew a show was huge because the whole country was talking about it. Now, with the Internet, 24-hour news, and chat rooms and blogs, etc. it is almost impossible not to get caught up in the "of the moment" blizzard of opinion and very little fact. No matter where a show opens now, people have already made their feelings known well before a final version is being presented. (Leap of Faith, anyone?) Hell, people pass judgement before a single performance has been held these days. (Spider-Man, anyone?) And that is sad.
No, what happened was they (and everyone else in the world, it seems) had great expectations for the show. Make that unrealistic expectations. Sure the show is full of Tony winners and nominees, written and directed by professionals of the same caliber. And it seems like a natural, if misguided, assumption that with all of that talent, you'd think the show would be better. Maybe so. But maybe the combination itself didn't work. Or maybe, and very likely, the pre-show press (including chat rooms, blogs, etc.) clouded the judgement of the critics. If you think they don't read all of this stuff, you are in need of a reality check. See the DVD Show Business and marvel at the MAJOR critics who sat around a table to Joe Allen's or some eatery and went down the list of shows opening in 2003-2004, TALKING "BUZZ" and DECIDING WHICH SHOWS THEY WERE GOING LIKE AND NOT LIKE before attending a single performance of any of them!
If you go into a show "knowing" that Sheri Rene Scott's character is a dull, sad woman, with all the crazy happening around her, and that she comes across as boring, that is what you are going to see. If you go in "knowing" that Laura Benanti is a hot ball of fun, with the best song in the show, then you'll see that she is the funniest one on stage with the funniest song. (Or conversely, if you are a fan of the message boards at Broadway World.com, you "know" that she is mugging and over-acting, then that's what you will see.) As a patron of the second preview, I saw that Sherie Rene's character was the serious one, but that she was clearly in command of the role and offered a nice counterpoint to the rest. I said as I was leaving the theatre that Laura Benanti will be Tony nominated and might even win. She was zany, crazy and very much in control. I stand by my feelings on this. I also told my companions that it was a real thrill to see Patti LuPone working on a role that was not totally complete yet. Her act two "Invisible" was an exercise in watching an actor's process. Yes, there were a lot of things that needed work (see my blog on that HERE). And I look forward to seeing what they did with it.
My point is that I saw a very different Verge than most people did. And mainly because I went in virtually clutter-free, able to make up my own mind. The discoveries were all mine, and I loved it. Even knowing what I know now about what has actually transpired, I wouldn't have changed the experience for all the tea in China. Now, when I go back, and I will, I know that what is in front of me is what the entire company thought was the very best they could do with the material they had to work with. And I will feel free to express my continued joy or my disappointment that they didn't do everything they could have.
Some, heck, most, of my really favorite shows are those that I had ZERO expectations of - Beauty and the Beast, Blood Brothers, Grind, Smile, The Story of My Life, Spring Awakening, RENT, In the Heights, next to normal. Of them, there were many more flops than hits in 25 plus years of going to shows. This season, I have no or low expectations for Sister Act, Wonderland and The Book of Mormon. I bet you I'll end up loving at least one of them WAY more than I ever thought possible.
By the way, I'm going to see Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark, in what (as of today) will be its 8th preview. If it doesn't delay again, I am still OK with that. I knew what I was getting into when I bought a preview ticket. And try as I might not to have any expectations, I have many. I expect to be thrilled by the flying, flabbergasted at the staging, and love the story of my favorite comic book hero. No matter what, love it or hate it, I already know I'll get my money's worth because watching art happen live in front of you is a winner every single time.
Let me have it by leaving your comments here, by emailing me at firstname.lastname@example.org, or by Tweeting me.